Some Quick Thoughts About Africa, the Crime of Terrorism and the Rome Statute

As readers may know, I have been paying particular attention to the African Union’s attempt to put together a comprehensive counter-terrorism treaty, and have already posted some thoughts on the matter on the al-Wasat blog a few days before Christmas.

A few more thoughts occurred to me today as I was reading (for my current employer) the statements given by delegations to the Ninth Assembly of States Parties of the International Criminal Court, which took place last month in New York. I still have a handful to go through, but so far the delegation from Nigeria’s statement (PDF file) has particularly caught my attention.

From the third paragraph of the statement, I quote and emphasize:

One significant contribution of our common efforts in developing an international criminal justice under the Rome Statute is the strengthening of the international community, acting in concert, to check the activities of armed non-state actors. As we all know, these are usually armed groups that operate outside state control or authority, often constituting threats to corporate existence of their victim states through operational styles marked by horrendous acts of impunity.

I was intrigued by the mention of ‘armed non-state actors’, also known as non-State armed groups. Of course, that term means many things. In fact, it is fairly self-explanatory: any armed group that is not under the direct control of a State is, logically, a non-State armed group.

But as I read that I subconsciously understood “terrorist groups” and that has brought me back to what I wrote last month.

In my post over at al-Wasat, I wrote that the AU’s efforts to create a comprehensive regional counterterrorism convention could give the necessary political impetus to pave the way towards a global comprehensive counterterrorism treaty that has been noticeably missing for the past decades.

It occurred to me that it could also pave the way for the inclusion of the Crime of Terrorism in the Rome Statute perhaps even sooner. The idea to include the Crime of Terrorism in the Rome Statute is nothing new: it was discussed at the Rome Conference in 1998, and has been pushed forward since, in particular by the Government of The Netherlands. So far efforts have failed, but should African States Parties – the largest regional bloc of the Assembly of States Parties of the ICC – decide to join the cause and prepare the groundwork for a common definition of the Crime of Terrorism, things could move forward fairly rapidly, perhaps even by the time of the next Review Conference, which should take place around 2017.

This is purely speculation – almost thinking outloud – and, for all I know, the Nigerian delegation simply meant rebel groups and other armed militias that have been plaguing the African continent’s stability and security for many years now. But considering the difficulty African States have in dealing with emerging terrorist groups in the Western and Eastern parts of the Continent, pushing for the internationalization of the prosecution of terrorist groups is not entirely senseless.

Or at least it would be an interesting strategy, had the Rome Statute system shown itself to be a little more reliable in executing arrest warrants against suspects. Unfortunately, as Northern Ugandans know too well, the arrest warrants issued in 2005 against the leadership of the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA), its leader Joseph Kony in particular, which is in a way a terrorist group itself, have yet to be executed and had had very little effect to deter the LRA’s activities. But that is a discussion for another time.

Advertisements

, , , ,

  1. #1 by CRY ME AN ONION on 7 January 2011 - 12:34

    6 Kenyans are under investigation by the International Criminal Court for their roles during the 2007 post election violence.
    The Kenyan members of parliaments have voted to withdraw from the ICC and repeal the international act. They want to set their own local courts and avoid for the six adversely mentioned to face ICC. In passing I would like to mention that the WikiLeaks from the US embassy have called Kenya a swamp of corruption.
    The ICC is noble. However, how much weight it has when countries, like Kenya, want to get of out in order to seek impunity for the accused by ICC.
    An arrest order is out for Al-Bashir and yet he is invited by the Kenya Government a signatory of the Rome statute.
    All African Intelligences probably know Joseph Kony (LRA) whereabouts.
    Al Shabab moves in and out of Kenya and the Somali pirates invest their money in Kenya Real estate.
    Moneys from terrorist activities are invested worldwide without impunity.
    How much teeth have the ICC?
    How long the impunity last?
    How long should the world support these corrupt governments?

    Cheers

    See Daily Nation articles regarding Kenya – http://www.nation.co.ke/News/politics/Kibaki%20Raila%20plot%20way%20out%20for%20Ocampo%206%20/-/1064/1085098/-/mc5yptz/-/index.html

  2. #2 by archipirata on 31 January 2011 - 18:37

    As you note, “armed non-state actors” includes many things. Consider the example of piracy. Some would argue that terrorism actually falls within the UN Convention of the Law of the Sea definition of piracy. If the Security Council decides to create special tribunals for somali piracy, crimes of terrorism at sea could fall within the jurisdiction of those special tribunals.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: